Get Schengen Visa Application Sample



Embassy I of the Federal Republic of Germany Dhaka
11 Riadani Av. Baridhara, Dhaka-1212 / Bangladesh
Mr. Md Anwar Ali Amit
By handover
Subject: Application for a Schengen visa here: Md Anwar Ali Amit Reference: Your letter in front 10.12.2017 Trademark (please specify if answering): RK-1-516 Amit 59965
Dear Mr. Amit,
HOUSE ADDRESS 11 Madani Av., Baridhara Dhaka-1212 Bangladesh POSTAL ADDRESS GPO-Box 6126, Dhaka-1000 / Bangladesh INTERNET www.dhaka.diplo.de TEL + 880 2 55 66 86 50 + 880 2 55 66 86 90 FAX +49 30 1817 67202 E-MAIL Rk-11@dhak.diplo.de WORKED BY Ines Dworschak-Borg TEL-SELECTION + 880-2 55 66 86 72
Dhaka, the 1st of February 2018
You have remonstrated against the decision of the embassy in Dhaka with letters of reference. The visa application was then re-examined.
The following remonstrative notification is issued:
1. The decision of the Dhaka embassy before 13 November 2017 is set aside and replaced by this decision.
2. The application for a visa for visiting purposes from 6 November 2017 is rejected.
Reason:
Bangladeshi nationals are welcome. § 4 para. 1 sentence 1 AufenthG i. In. Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on visas (hereinafter referred to as the Visa Code) for entry into and residence in the Schengen area (and hence also the ) of a residence title in the form of a visa.






Page No- 2
In view of the specified and intended length of stay, the visa applied for is a vis. § 6 para. 1 no. LAufenthG in conjunction with Art. 1 of the Schengen Implementation Convention (SDU) and the Visa Code (Art. 1 (1) Art. 2 No. 2 - 5).
Your application is admissible, but does not meet the requirements for issuing Schengen visa under Article 21 of the Visa Code i. V. in. Art. 6 Schengen Borders Code.
Gemill3 Art. 21 para. 1 Visa Code are the types listed in Art. 6 para. 1 lit. a, c, d and e Schengen Code of Conduct.
In particular, it must be assessed whether there is a risk of unlawful immigration, whether the applicant poses a risk to the security of the Member States and whether it intends to leave the territory of the Member States in due time.
In your case the examination of the overall situation has given rise to doubtful reasons for the readiness to return. The legal basis for the granting of a uniform Schengen visa for a visit to a three-month visit is § 6 Abs. 1 AufenthG i. V. m. Art. 19, 21, 32 VK .. Da-nach requires the issuing of the visa, among other things. that the applicant materially fulfills the entry requirements and there is no ground for refusal. According to Article 21 (1) (2), when assessing a single visa application, it is necessary, in particular, to assess whether the applicant is at risk of illegal immigration and whether he intends, before the expiry of the period of validity of the visa applied for Territory of the Member States. leave. The visa is refused on justified doubts about this intention (Art. 32 (1) (h) of the VK).
It is Sadie dos V isurnantragstellers. To judge the national representation, Hannah judges, on the one hand, of his personal distinctions on the one hand, of the general conditions in his State of residence, or of all known defilements between this Slant and the other, on the other hand On the other hand, there are clues as to which of these limbs are to be used as indications of the orientation of the internal object of the return will (Winton.) (assert sick Art. 14 Ahs. 1 lit. d 1. V. m and Annexes 11. It then states that the documents on the basis of which the applicant's intention to leave the membership of the Member States are to be counted, inter alia, the proof of financial status in the State of residence, proof of employment status and property ownership as well as proof of fingliederting jill resident state unhand of ang to Ianuliuu n stomachs and hereditary status.
In your case, the corresponding pronunciation by the messenger based on the rootedness or the rack-and-tear perspectives resulted. so that in Fri: chins it was not possible to test the resurrected return period.
On 06.11.2017, they applied for a visa for Fourism to Germany. With her application. You graduated from your university with a degree in law and in the field of licensing. Hug and Intel bookings and your father's account exclusions and registrations
kinc auspiciously strong familiiirc rooting could not be proven. They are unmarried according to their own anas and have no children, Attlaund Hires age is atich the familiar,: [litium.] To their kin: 111, zroiohoriel k I I
Page No- 3
The financial and professional roots were not proven. They said they are currently studying at Independent University. You also stated that you do not have your own account and income and your father will pay for all the expenses of the journey. You submitted accountants to your father's company. You did not submit further documents.
In the context of Hirer Remonstration, you were asked on 13.12.2017 to submit your account details to your father's private account. The first deadline of 20.12.2017 you missed. After emeuter reminder put through the message. You on 31.12.2017 again account ausztige the company account before.
Since the willingness to return was not determined after all this, the uniform Vi-sum pursuant to Art. 32 para. 1 VK, Art. 6 para. 1 lit. e Schengen Borders Code (SGK) failed due to failure to meet the eligibility requirements.
According to Art. 23 para. Lit. b, 25 (1), a Member State may apply to a third country. which do not fulfill certain conditions of Article 6 (1) SGC, allow entry into its territory on humanitarian grounds or for reasons of national interest or under international obligations. However, such grandees have neither been asserted nor are they evident.
The application was therefore rejected. The denial of the visa is maintained. Right of appeal: An action against this decision may be filed with the Berlin Administrative Court within one month of notification. With friendly greetings In the mission

Ines Dworsc Consulate Secretary

No comments:

Post a Comment