A Story of Acid Attacked Girl

The case in favor of government is that the victim Nobab Foisunnesa, examinee of H. S. C, 1995 as having been examinee she used the road of college, the defendant- 1 used to pay love as the victim did not response on the date of incident 6/ 4/ 1999 in Tuesday at around 11 PM as the victim Fazilatunnesa and younger sister having to have response to nature near of Vita in roof less bathroom as the younger sister of victim Rabea Awshor standing beside with Harrican when she came out from bathroom 1 and 2 defendant of the case threw A bottle of acid on the face of victim Fazilatunnesa. So the face of victim burnt as the both eyes may spoil forever. Another sister the witness recognized the defendant as having been light of the Harrican on her hand so she screamed and the defendants fled by running. The victim got admitted at Laksham Government Hospital. As the condition was serious she had taken to Cumilla Medical Hospital and when the condition got downgraded she took to Dhaka Medical College Hospital. The treatment is continuing there.

As mentioned the suit above defendant Md Hossen and against Hemayat Ullah under the section of A, B, C of 5 of Women and Children Suppression law and under the regulation of 14 as the defendants heard the hearing he claimed as free of guilty. Then in the court, in favor of government, 10 witnesses have been investigated. After the completion of witness of the government the defendant Md Hossen has been examined under the section of 342 of Civil Law. During the examination the defendant claimed himself guilty free and no witness will give in the court informed. When asked on anything will you, he shows on the court three pages of written speech and some paper cutting and pictures as well. Another defendant Hemayat Ullah is fled so that it was not possible to ask him anything. Learned advocate in favor of the government directing the case of Hemayat Ullah Himu. Defendant Himu is not involved with the incident. And he was not presented at the incident. It is told that when it is said that not to hug freely and because previous enemy relation the defendant Himu has been involved in this case.


Defendant Md Hossen said in his written speech I studied at Luksham having been lodging. As I was examinee of Kamil they involved me in the case, victim Fazilatunnesa lived at her uncle’s home named paradise in Luksham. Defendant Hemayat Ullah lived at the same house. Tahmina also lived at the same home. No investigation has been done of the father and mother of the victim in that case. The investigation officer even has not went in the Madrasa also. Victim Fazilatunnessa is working at Acid Survival Foundation. Her eyes are spoiled. Defendant Md Hossen mentioned that in his written speech. As investigating the defendant his case the description goes like that the defendant has not thrown acid. There was love relation with the victim with a number of boys, someone among them may did it. Then the victim has been taken to Homio Doctor. One bottle of medicine when used on the injury of victim the stain has made on the face.

No comments:

Post a Comment