The Best Example from Chandpur Union Parishad

6	(Ka) Chandpur-Barisal via (Kaliganj) 93 kilometer Kha) Chandpur-Barisal via (Sheora)	Chandnaisha 3.80 m. Miarchar 2.60 m.	Day/night open	3.96 m. 3.20 m.
Attention: Ludda and Kaliganj area 2 red light Boya have been placed. Azadbazar to Chandpur bound all naval vehicles keeping the two lighted Boya left side are requested to move.
7	Chandpur-Barisal (Through 6 No channel via Chaprokash) 90 kilometer	Jalalpur 2.70 m.	Same	2.90 m.
8	Chandpur-Barisal (Through Nandirbazar) 1.07 m.	Ishanbala (Ibrahimpur) 2.70 m.	Same	2.80 m.
9	Abupor-Modhurahat 3 kilometer	Modhurahat Nala point 3.30 m.	Same	3.50 m.
Attention: Miarchar area of Chandpur-Barisal waterways withdrawing red lighted Boya 01 lighted Boya (with green light) has been established. All vehicles from Barisal to Chandpur bound are requested to move keeping te lighted Boya left side.
10	Chandpur-Damudda (Through Patti Nala) 47 kilometer	Patti Nala point 1.62 m.	Day/Night	1.98 m.
11	Laxmipur (Mojuchowdhuryhat)- Bhola (Ilisha) 26 kilometer (Via Motirhat) Harina-Alubazar (Via Laxmirchar) 10 kilometer	Rahmat Khali Khal 2.00 m. Laxmirchar-Alubazar among Khal 3.30 m.	Same Day/Night open	2.44 m. 3.60 m.
12	Chandpur-Ichlighat (Via CHD Ghat) 06 kilometer	Beside W Rahman Jute Mill 2.74 kilometer	Same	3.20 m.
Attention: In Harina-Alubazar Feri route dredging Khari point Laxmirchar area 01 green lighted Boya has been installed. All vehicles from Chandpur/Harina to Alubazar bound are requested to move keeping the green lighted Boya in left side. Attention: Star marked shole area of waterways are requested to move taking tide facility along with BIWTA pilot.

2. Bridge Clearance (From water flat)

SL	Name of waterway	Name of Bridge	Bridge Clearance
1	Chandpur-Ichuli	Chandpur Old Bazar bridge	13.10 m.
2	Dhaka-Damudda	Patti Bridge	09.90 m.
3	Dhaka-Matlab	Sree Rayer Char bridge	07.32 m.
4	Dhaka-Naria	Naria Bridge	09.90 m.

River notification No45/2016 (East delta unit, Chittagong)

Date: 15-03-1423 bangla

29-06-2016 AD

SL	Name and distance of waterway	Shole name and minimum depth	Day/Night	Draft Limit
1	Ka) Chittagong-Chargojaria via Vashanchar 114 kilometer Kha) Chittagong-Chargojaria via Sandip 134 kilometer	Ramgoti Damburhat area and Vashanchar 1 no from this to Vashanchar 3 2.00 m.	Day/Night open	3.96m.
Attention: From Ramgoti Lamburhat area and Vashanchar 1 No Boya of Chittagong Azadbazar naval route to Vashanchar 3 Boya due to having navigability at the time of full tide with careful taking mximum 3.96 m. draft are requested to move along with authority’s masterpilots.
2	Chittagong-Cox’bazar (Inside channel) Kutubdia-matarbari-Moheshkhali) 200 kilometer	Matarbari and Bakkhali point 2.10 m.	Only day	2.00 m.
3	Chittagong-Kaptai- 64 kilometer	Isapur-Kodala 2.00 m.	Same	2.00 m.
4	Rangamati-Kaptai 30 kilomter	Kaptaighat 3.00 m.	Same	2.75 m.
5	Kaptai-Bilaichari 20 kilometer	Dhanpatatila 4.50  m.	Same	4.30 m.
6	Rangamati-Marissha (To Maini Bazar pint 127 kilometer)	Dudhchari 3.60 m.	Same	3.25 m.
7	Rangamati-Choto Harina (To Barkal) 64 kilometer	Amtoli 4.70 m.	Same	4.50 m.
8	Rangamati-Mohalchari (To Naniarchar) 44 kilometer	Burighat 3.00 m.	Same	2.75 m.
9	Teknaf-Saintmartin 37 kilometer	Naf river Mohona 2.90 m.	Same	2.90 m. *

                                                         

*Star marked shole area of waterways are requested to move taking tide facility along with BIWTA pilot.

Get Example of Deeds

5.5

As the formed allegation is read and heard before the present defendants they claiming themselves as not guilty sought justice.

               The prosecution aiming to proof case is verifying a total 5 witnesses in court. This is an old case. According to 339(Ga)(1) rule of criminal proceedings the magistrate will have to complete trial within 180 days. In the case on 16/04/2015 from forming charge after passing about 23 months the prosecution is failed to present all witnesses.

               According to 171 and 244 rules of criminal proceedings the prosecution is to appear witnesses in court. It is said in 35(3) article of holy constitution, “Every person accused of criminal offence shall have the right to a speedy and public trial by an independent and impartial court or tribunal established by law”. But prosecution and informer are failed to give assistance in speedy trial settlement appearing witnesses in court due time.

6-6

It is in 171(2) rule of criminal proceedings that, “Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), it shall be the responsibility of the police-officer to ensure that the complainant or the witness appears before the Court at the time of hearing of the case”. But the important of part of prosecution police department is failed to appear witnesses on behalf of prosecution.

               It is said in 51 DLR (AD) of honorable Appeal Division, page 38, “It is duty of the prosecution to ensure witnesses as per section 244 of the code. From the order sheet it appears the case remained pending for quite a long time and several adjournments were taken by the prosecution to produce witnesses but ultimately other than pw-1, no witness was examined by the prosecution. From the order dated 21/01/89 it also does not appear that they made any prayer for

7-7

It is said in 171(2) of criminal proceedings, “Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), it shall be the responsibility of the police-officer to ensure that the complainant or the witness appears before the court at the time of hearing of the case”. But the important part police of department of prosecution is failed to produce witness before the court.

               It is said in 51 DLR (AD) of honorable appeal division, page 38, “It is duty of the prosecution to adduce witnesses as per section 244 of the code. From the order sheet it appears the case remained pending for quite a long time and several adjournments were taken by the prosecution to produce witnesses but ultimately other than pw-1, no witness was examined by the prosecution. From the order dated 21/01/89 it also does not appear that they made any prayer for

8-8

Adjournment of the case for examining any further witness on a subsequent date. The prosecution as a matter of fact failed to produce any prosecution witnesses and in such circumstances the learned Magistrate rightly acquitted the accused respondents under section 245 (1) of the code since subsection 2 of section 171 of the code provides that it shall be the responsibility of the police officer to ensure that the complainant and the witnesses appear before the court at the time of hearing of the case. It is preliminary responsibility of the conducting police prosecutor or the public prosecutor to produce the witness in a case. The is nothing on record to show that any step was taken by the prosecution through

9-9

The police officer of secure the attendance of any witness in the case.”

In International Universal Humanitarian Declaration, I.C.C.P.R. or I.C.E.S.C.R. Bangladesh as member of United Nation and in another two certificate as rectifier country is bound to follow its rules and regulation. There is rule to get speedy trial in these certificates. In our constitution also contains the matter of speedy trial. According to witness law the court can give punishment on basis of faith to only a witness. It is found through reviewing documents of this case that, all important witnesses of the case have already been given all possess. It is said in 134 rule of witness law- “No particular number of witness shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact”.

 It is contained in 29 D.L.R. (S.C) 211 of honorable Supreme Court that, No particular number of witnesses should in any case be required for the proof of any fact. If believed, conviction can be based on the solitary evidence”.

15-15

In rules have been failed to proof the all guilty out of the succession. On the other hand against defendant 1) Kafil Uddin, 2) Tajul Islam, 3) Kala Mia @Kailla the court assume in statement of witnesses due to having inconsistency the prosecution failed to proof allegation against them. The defendants said around all witnesses in prosecution are the relative witness. In this regard it is contained in honorable justice Mohammad Hamidul Haque’s Trial of Civil Suits And Criminal Cases (Ed-2011) 2^nd para, page 372,

“But now the uniform view of the Appellate Division is that evidence of a witness should not be discarded or disbelieved only on the ground of relationship or enmity. The Appellate Division is of the view that if the evidence of the witness is believable and if there is no reason to disbelieve his evidence, then only on the ground of relationship or enmity, evidence of such witness cannot be discarded and conviction may be given relying on the evidence

16-16

Of such a witness see. 13 BLC (AD) 1, 9 BLC (AD) 122, 5 BLC (AD) 41, 1 BLD (AD) 200, 58 BLR (Ad) 73, 28 BLD (Ad) 1, 26 BCR (AD) 267, 15 MLR (AD) 454, 25 BCR (AD) 58, 19 BLT (AD) 38”.

               The defendant could wait until being settled the case not denying order of honorable Supreme Court.

               The learned advocate on behalf of statement said in written argument that, “In the charge sheet although there is no mention regarding land possession of plaintiff and defendants the investigation officer being influenced illegally by defendants being present in honorable court stated in questioning, it is found in my investigation that it is on possession of defendants for 30-35 years. The complainant party in 2010 in political perspective the means of possess is alleged land in on possession of plaintiff from 2010 that means the incident has been happened in shop house possessed by complainant. Besides, if the statement was true that means the defendant for 30-35 year during on possession in 2010 the plaintiff took possession from defendants. The defendants must would file case seeking Khas possession evicting the plaintiff”.

                         

3 Best Divorce Examples

Bangladesh

Bismiallahir Rahmanir Rahim

Be live long

4 No Kaptai Union Parishad

P.O: Kaptai Natun Bazar, P.S: Kaptai, Rangamati Hill Tract District

Office Phone: 0352956268

Source:

Date: 17/07/2017

‘Notice’

Memorandum No: 1/2017/72

Date: 17/07/2017

            On 12/07/2017 in context of application regarding effectiveness of your divorce for supporting your self defense on next 27/08/2017 fixed by this village court you are directed to be present physically.

To: Mohammad Ali Sumon 319, Harwitch Road, Colchester, Essex Co-4, HR, UK

S/D Illegible From: Chairman 4 No Kaptai Union Parisdhad Kaptai Rangamati Hill District

Bangladesh

Bismiallahir Rahmanir Rahim

Be live long

4 No Kaptai Union Parishad

P.O: Kaptai Natun Bazar, P.S: Kaptai, Rangamati Hill Tract District

Office Phone: 0352956268

Source:

Date: 17/07/2017

‘Notice’

Memorandum No: 1/2017/72

Date: 17/07/2017

            On 12/07/2017 in context of application regarding effectiveness of your divorce for supporting your self defense on next 27/08/2017 fixed by this village court you are directed to be present physically.

To: Abdur Rahman Care of- Mohammad Ali Sumon Father: Late Md. Musa Village: South Catroli, Greenview AA/A, Road No 7, P.O: Pahartali, PS: Pahartali, District: Chittagong

S/D Illegible From: Chairman 4 No Kaptai Union Parisdhad Kaptai Rangamati Hill District

To,

Officer-in-Charge

Gulshan Thana

DMP, Dhaka

Subject: About filing General Diary

Sir,

            I bellow mentioned signatory Abdur Rahman, Father: Md. Abdul Halim, Permanent Address- Village: Chapachou, P.S: Chouddagram, District: Comilla, Present: House No-11, Block-A, Road-2, Rayerbag Matuail, P.S: Jatrabari, Dhaka-1362 alleging in this regard that, Kohinur Akter named a woman through Loknath Money Exchange which address- B-200/22, Gulshan Shopping Center (2^nd Floor), Gulshan 1, Dhaka-1212, Mobile No+8801722-588788, +8801712-235574, Ex Address- B-97, Gulshan Shopping Center (2^nd Floor), Gulshan 1, Dhaka-1212, Mobile No-+8801711-588788, +8801756-825971, mentionable in its money receipt that, on 26/11/2012 which memo No SL-NO-ME/L/30/OI/LON exchanged BD Tk 36,42000 into 30,000 pound. The woman made entry the pounds in Bangladesh passport No W0222876 of my relative Md. Ali Sumon, mentioned in money receipt which illegal work according to government of the people’s republic of Bangladesh law. I suspect whether the Loknath Money Receipt. I also suspect the woman Kohinur Akter Lipi can harm my relative Md. Ali Sumon in bad purpose. It is very need to justify true or false of the money receipt.

            Therefore, you are requested to include the above mentioned matter into your General Diary to take necessary steps.

Date: 25/07/2017

Yours Sincerely S/D Illegible (Md. Abdur Rahman) Mobile: +8801716-416059

  

Date: 12/07/2017

To,

Chairman

4 No Kaptai Union Parishad

Kaptai, Rangamati, Chittagong

Subject: Application of informing about “Divorce Giving” effectiveness.

Sir,

I beg most respectfully state that, I Mohammad Ali Sumon, Father: Late Mohammad Musa, Mother: Parvin AKter, 319, Harwich Road, Colchester, Exxex CO-4, HR, UK. My wife Mrs. Kohinur AKter Lipi (Father: Haji Kabir Ahmed, Mother: Hajera Begum, Village: 195/A, Kaptai, Natun Bazar, PS: Kaptai, District: Rangamati) on 09-07-2014 gave divorce according to law and according to 7 No rule of Muslim Family Law Ordinance 1961 (MFLO) for effecting Divorce sent the divorce letter to you through registry post office (Acknowledge letter No 500) on 17/07/2014. According to law divorce is effective after 90 days of sending duly to local Union Parishad Chariman.

Mentionable, copy of divorce letter was sent to Mrs Kohinur Akter Lipi, (Father: Haji Kabir Ahmed) and his father Haji Kabir Ahmed and 4 No Ward Member Kaptai Union Parishad Mr. Jahid Member on 17/07/2014 through registered post office (Along with receive acknowledgement which No 497, 498, 499).

Therefore, you are humbly requested taking necessary steps will inform in written about effectiveness of divorce.

End

Yours Sincerely and Obedient-

Mohammad Ali Sumon

Father: Late Mohammad Musa

Mother: Parvin Akter

Address: South Cattali, Greenview AA/A,

Road No-7, P.O: Pahartali

P.S: Pahartali, District: Chittagong on behalf,

S/D Illegible

(Md. Abdur Rahman)

Relation: Brother

Mobile: 01716-416059

Copy:

1. Md. Jahid Member, 4 No Ward Member, Kaptai Union Parishad.

Get Example of Vision of Political Party

Bangladesh Democratic Council- BDC
Slogan: On the Way to Real Democracy
Ref:                                             Date:
‘Bangladesh Democratic Council’ is a social organization for the people welfare and awareness creating. The main goal of the ‘Bangladesh Democratic Council’ is to establish the real practice of democracy to achieve social and financial development for overall of all of the people and to keep up the attitude of the freedom fight and culture having been the respect to the independence and of the country. The community relation and friendly mind, avoiding the cruelty among the people having been raise the mind of nationalism and patriotism and the chief goal of this organization is to try overall to fill up the basic needs of the people. The organization will contribute to save the human right believing the development in both countries through keeping good relation with the countries outside. Your help, sympathy, and simultaneous participation will inspire us for the case of creating strong base and width and will stronger and speeder the organization.